But I would often find that I had to watch them multiple times so I was sending them the right quote to refute the argument they were making, and after all that time of sifting through the right videos they would never watch them anyway. So, I thought that I needed these quotes in text form, organized by what argument they addressed, complete with citations, who said it, dates etc. so I could just copy and paste them into whatever comment thread I was in and be done with it. Thus, the quotes document that floats around a lot of groups and graces this website (called the quotes databank) was born. So, this article is going to be a little different from my usual ones, which air to the side of military theory, and instead be more about what I hope to be some constructive criticism for things I see within our EU community. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.But I know the word is also used to mean something you just decide, that isn’t at all canon compatible, and that usage isn’t wrong per se. So Lord of the Rings was one of the fandoms I had an eye on as I got into online fandom in the early aughts, and then also Silmarillion fandom. But I was pretty passive until Tumblr gave me my very own soapbox for my fandom opinions, an actual audience, and mutuals who liked to talk Tolkien from time to time. Then I started theorizing in public, and then fanfic.
I’ve already talked about the BBC’s Sherlock Holmes and his potential asexuality in detail a while back. Though series creator Steven Moffat said Sherlock is in no way asexual because asexual people are "boring"—fuck you too, Moffat—I feel as though asexuality perfectly defines Sherlock’s character. Sherlock doesn’t show any outward interest in sex, never actively pursues any relationship for the sake of romance, and when he thinks someone is interested in him, he’s pretty quick to turn that person down. In "A Study in Pink", while talking to Watson, Sherlock reveals that having a girlfriend is "not his area" and he also heavily implies that he’s not interested in men either. Earlier in the conversation, he tells Watson that he finds the whole relationship thing dull. So I don’t know what Moffat was talking about.
It’s important to distinguish between these vastly different corners of fandom because they aren’t all in conversation with one another — and when they are, they often approach the conversation very differently. If you believe in the work we do at Vox, please support us by becoming a member. It requires resources, dedication, and independence. Please note, if you do happen to give it another solid shot, feel free to touch base with me, I'm always looking for players to delve into RP with, and I do mean always. Anyway those power-tripping 15 year olds are 25 years old now, post-shutdown. After making (and encountering) young heroines and villains with troubled past and times spent in juvie, I decided to flesh out the place and see if others wanted to add their stories to it.
" (for example) memes reblogged by fans who insist (or imply) no one is allowed to ship them (and/or lame jokes about only boring straight people liking them as a pairing) is certainly an annoyance. Similarly applies to close friendships between two male or female characters. Just because you like them as in a romantic relationship does not mean everyone must. • Yes, one of my headcanons is that Levi doesn't have what a lot of people think he has canonly.
headcanon ideas generator is most commonly used by members of fan communities. It’s sometimes used jokingly when presenting especially wild theories. Bro I do HCs all the time (literally every day) that doesn’t mean you’re a bad person.
If you do change a character, make sure you explain that this is a legitimate difference and not a mistake so people don’t try to helpfully correct you for the rest of your life. People like helping, especially when they love your character and want to make sure you know absolutely everything about them to make it as realistic as possible. Throughout the 2000s, particularly from the 2020s onwards, some fans noticed an increase in people using (insert term)-coded with greater frequency, sometimes as a means of implying a greater canonical validity than just a headcanon generator[1]. For example, instead of fans headcanoning a character as autistic, they were autistic-coded, and instead of a character being head-canoned as queer, they were queer-coded. In terms of a given literary series, "canon" describes a set of works that are collectively recognized by the community as having authenticity.
Also, there are individuals that share some characteristics of autism such as robot-like behavior and/or lack of social understanding but aren’t autistic. After I became aware of my autism, my mom tried to get me interested in shows that feature autistic characters but I wasn’t able to get interested in them. In my last blog post I wrote about how the representation of autism and characters with autism are mostly poorly done and act like a walking bag of stereotypes as a result. The AI-powered tool for transforming diverse materials into inspired creations. Transform your ideas into stunning visuals, image generator with like ChatGPT AI technology for high-quality images.
